Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Deborah Lingenfelter v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 21-1088 · judgment December 10, 2021


Certiorari denied · May 16, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

The Tenth Circuit affirmed summary judgment against plaintiff Deborah Lingenfelter, a union employee at a Kaiser hospital, who claimed that the hospital retaliated against her because she exercised her right to take approved FMLA leave to care for her autistic sons. The Circuit erroneously applied the business-judgment rule to preclude evidence examining the truthfulness of Kaiser’s explanation of the decision to terminate. Ms. Lingenfelter presents one question: In an employment case, where the plaintiff disputes the truthfulness of the employer’s asserted reason for termination, may a court immunize that reason from an examination of its truthfulness by characterizing it as a “business judgment”?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Robert M. Liechty
Cross & Liechty, P.C.

For respondent
Mark B. Wiletsky
Holland & Hart LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. May 16 2022
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 20 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
  3. Apr 19 2022
    Waiver of right of respondent Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado to respond filed.
  4. Mar 29 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 2, 2022)