Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Melchor Munoz v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 20-14688 · judgment November 8, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether – in a case where (1) the revocation of a criminal defendant’s citizenship is mandatory as a result of a plea to a criminal conviction but (2) the defendant was told during the plea proceeding only that the Government “might” seek revocation – the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 “date on which the facts supporting the claim presented could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence” trigger per se begins to run on the date that the Government sends a letter indicating an intent to bring a revocation proceeding that does not specifically state that the revocation proceeding is mandatory rather than discretionary.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael Robert Ufferman
Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A.
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Proceedings
- Apr 25 2022Petition DENIED.
- Apr 06 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
- Mar 31 2022Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Mar 23 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 28, 2022)
- Mar 04 2022Application (21A363) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 23, 2022.
- Feb 23 2022Application (21A363) to extend further the time from March 8, 2022 to March 23, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
- Feb 16 2022Application of Melchor Munoz for a further extension of time not accepted for filing. (February 16, 2022)
- Jan 25 2022Application (21A363) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 8, 2022.
- Jan 21 2022Application (21A363) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 6, 2022 to March 9, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.