Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jay Hoon Choi v. Virginia
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Virginia, No. 210180 · judgment November 4, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Issue 1. Following the police reading of the rights enumerated in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), how long after a person in custody asserts his/her 6th Amendment right to counsel is contact with an attorney required. Issue 2. Are state magistrates required to tell a recent arrestee, who is brought before them that what the arrestee says may be used against him/her; that the arrestee has a right to remain silent; and that the arrestee has a right to have an attorney, before further proceedings occur Parties The parties to this case are petitioner Jay Hoon Choi. and the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Marvin David Miller
The Law Offices of Marvin D. Miller
For respondent
Andrew Nathan Ferguson
Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 28 2022Petition DENIED.
- Mar 09 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
- Mar 02 2022Waiver of right of respondent Commonwealth of Virginia to respond filed.
- Feb 02 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 7, 2022)