Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Steve Wilson Briggs v. James Cameron, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-17229 · judgment October 20, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether, by disregarding properly established U.S. authorities (Corpus Juris Secundum, C.J.S.), to surreptitiously create its own copyright law system (based on Melville and David Nimmer’s uNimmer on Copyright”, which runs counter to the C.J.S.), the 9th Circuit has betrayed the Founders’ intents.
-
Whether U.S. judges and justices’ ownership of shell corporations subverts faith in the U.S. judicial system, and/or betrays the Founders’ intents.
-
Whether a ruling that ignores superseding law, to base itself in subordinate law, can be valid.
-
Whether U.S. federal courts using Ashcroft v Iqbal to avoid accountability and hide their improper copyright infringement rulings, has undermined America’s national character and global standing.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Steve K. Wilson Briggs
For respondent
Jean-Paul Jassy
Jassy Vick Carolan LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 21 2022Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Mar 02 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
- Feb 17 2022Waiver of right of respondents James Cameron, et al. to respond filed.
- Jan 14 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2022)