Jean Barton, et vir v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.

When the lower federal courts abandon 28 U.S.C. Section 1738- State and Territorial statutes and judicial proceedings; full faith and credit and im­ peratives of the fifth amendment to provide equal protection for an sixty nine year old senior by denying that it is a manifest injustice and express­ ing disbelief of fraud upon the court, does it set a dangerous precedent for all landowners whose land has been taken unconstitutionally?

Should the Court grant certiorari to resolve the significant division among the circuits concerning the jurisdictional prerequisites for appealing a 28 U.S.C. § 1738 and No. 14-17498 of the Ninth Ap­ peals publish opinion; Claim Splitting while an Objection was filed with the 9th Circuit a timely appeal was submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court and did the Ninth Circuit improperly applied a defective Res Judicata that voided a 28 U.S.C. § 1738 and No. 14-17498 by law that protected against the 9th Claim Splitting which allowed Chase Bank, ownership of a Bifurcated Mortgage that lacked Due Process when taking property?

Should this be a Direct Appeal to the Supreme Court for a violation of Constitutional law “Due Process”, 28 U.S.C. § 1738 and should the court grant certiorari to resolve the significant division among the circuits concerning the jurisdictional prerequisites?