Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Shalini Ahmed v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, No. 19-2213 · judgment April 13, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The questions presented are: Is a bond forfeiture proceeding sufficiently civil in nature such that it falls under certain rules governing civil actions and should be treated as a civil proceeding, though it arises from an underlying criminal case? Does a surety have the right to intervene at the inception of any bond forfeiture proceed ing, including when the government moves for declaration of bond forfeiture? Is a determination of the nature of a bond for feiture proceeding separate and final from the underlying merits of the bond forfeiture, such that it falls under the Cohen doctrine estab lished by this Court and thus appellate juris diction applies?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Shalini Ahmed
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 22 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jan 13 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
- Jan 11 2021Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Dec 22 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 29, 2021)