Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Big Time Vapes, Incorporated, et al. v. Food and Drug Administration, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 19-60921 · judgment June 25, 2020


Certiorari denied · June 7, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 4% cert probability

Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Fifth Circuit decision below, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and counsel who has filed here before.

Question presented

Congress enacted the Tobacco Control Act (TCA or “the Act”) in 2009, imposing a detailed regulatory framework initially limited to cigarettes and “smokeless tobacco” (essentially, snuff). But TCA § 387a(b) also gave the Secretary of Health and Human Services the unilateral power to extend the TCA’s reach to cover any other “tobacco product,” a capacious term capturing “any product made or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption, including any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product.” The TCA does not require the Secretary to make any factual finding, consider any particular factors, or even hew to any broadly worded limiting principle in deciding whether to extend federal regulation over additional “tobacco products.” In 2016, the FDA employed this authority, “deeming” everything meeting the “tobacco product” definition to be subject to the TCA. In one fell swoop, the Agency extended the TCA’s requirements to everything Congress had declined to regulate in 2009 (like cigars, hookah, and pipe tobacco), as well as to any other existing and future “tobacco products,” including the vapor products of particular concern to Petitioners. The question presented is: Whether Petitioners have stated a claim that § 387a(b) grants excessive policymaking discretion to the executive branch to determine which tobacco products shall be federally regulated, impermissibly delegating legislative authority in violation of the separation of powers established by the Constitution.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jerad Wayne Najvar
Chalmers, Adams, Backer & Kaufmann LLC

For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jun 07 2021
    Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by 19 National and State Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Product Advocacy Associations GRANTED.
  2. Jun 07 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  3. May 18 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
  4. May 12 2021
    Reply of petitioners Big Time Vapes, Incorporated, et al. filed.
  5. Apr 28 2021
    Brief of respondents Food and Drug Administration, et al. in opposition filed.
  6. Mar 18 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 28, 2021.
  7. Mar 17 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 29, 2021 to April 28, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  8. Feb 19 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 29, 2021.
  9. Feb 18 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 26, 2021 to March 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  10. Jan 26 2021
    Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by 19 National and State Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Product Advocacy Associations.
  11. Jan 13 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 26, 2021.
  12. Jan 11 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 27, 2021 to February 26, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  13. Dec 18 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 27, 2021)