Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Paul Anthony Ashby v. United States
IFP petition · District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 14-CF-414 · judgment January 10, 2019
Question presented
As both the United States and the District of Columbia Court of Appeals recognized in this case, the Pinkerton doctrine of co-conspirator liability is not authorized by any statute in the District of Columbia and did not exist in the common law that Congress adopted for the District of Columbia in the 1901 Code. The question presented is whether the District of Columbia Court of Appeals unlawfully usurped the role of the legislature in violation of the separation-ofpowers principles that Congress incorporated into the District of Columbia Charter when it held that it had the “inherent power” to adopt Pinkerton liability without authorization by the legislature.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Samia Fam
Public Defender Service
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jul 15 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jul 12 2021Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jun 28 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2021)