Bin Yang v. Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, et al.

Petitioner’s medical education exceeds the requirement of California Business and Professional Code 2085-2089 and approved by UCLA, Harvard and Baylor medical schools. Is it fraud that Medical Board of California (Respondent) turn Petitioner’s medical education into nursing through “their expert” who does not know the difference between medical and nursing internships?

Is it fraud that an attorney stole Petitioner’s money, never served Respondent, and caused her case dismissed for “no action” with tremendous personal and family losses? And Petitioner is not his only victim.

There is NO time limit to set aside a judgement by fraud per Rule 60 b (3). Is it constitutional that the Supreme Court of California disregards the frauds and deprives Petitioner’s rights granted by Amendment XIV?

Is it constitutional for licensing agents to set innocent up with “their expert,” AGAIN AND AGAIN?

Is it constitutional for the justice system to actively and inactively assist the government agencies to set innocents up, legalize their crime, and get paid, AGAIN AND AGAIN? 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Bin Yang vs. The Medical Board of California