Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Luz Hernandez v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 19-12702, 19-12907 · judgment October 23, 2020
Question presented
The district court issued an order of restitution in the amount of over $4.7 million pursuant to the government’s ex parte motion filed after petitioner’s attorney had withdrawn from the case and in the absence of actual notice to or consent by petitioner. In the motion, the government claimed that the former attorney had agreed to the restitution judgment and thus that no restitution hearing was required. Does the imposition of financial penalties as part of a felony sentencing violate a defendant’s Fifth Amendment right to due process and Sixth Amendment right to counsel where the defendant lacks notice of, and the assistance of counsel regarding, the government’s ex parte request for such penalties?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jacqueline Esther Shapiro
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jul 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jul 01 2021Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jun 10 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 21, 2021)