Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Luz Hernandez v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 19-12702, 19-12907 · judgment October 23, 2020


Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021

Question presented

The district court issued an order of restitution in the amount of over $4.7 million pursuant to the government’s ex parte motion filed after petitioner’s attorney had withdrawn from the case and in the absence of actual notice to or consent by petitioner. In the motion, the government claimed that the former attorney had agreed to the restitution judgment and thus that no restitution hearing was required. Does the imposition of financial penalties as part of a felony sentencing violate a defendant’s Fifth Amendment right to due process and Sixth Amendment right to counsel where the defendant lacks notice of, and the assistance of counsel regarding, the government’s ex parte request for such penalties?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jacqueline Esther Shapiro

For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jul 08 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  3. Jul 01 2021
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  4. Jun 10 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 21, 2021)