Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Roberto Luis Rene Martinez v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 20-14580 · judgment April 30, 2021
Questions presented
-
When a District Court vacates a sentence pursuant to the United States Supreme Court Decision in RUTLEDGE v. UNITED STATES, 116 S.Ct 1246 , 134 L.ed. 2d 419, 517 U.S. 292 (1996). Is a Correction of the Defendants Judgment and Commitment Order required.
-
Does the District Court1s failure to correct a Defendant's Judgment and Commitment Order represent a deprivation of life and liberty as defined by the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution
-
Does the District Court's refusal to correct the Judgment and Commitment order essentially create a double jeopardy? Multiple teirs of government agencies have used and will use this information to deprive Martinez of his Life and Liberty based on a count that was vacated through due process. !i
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Roberto Luis Rene Martinez
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 4, 2021 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Jul 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jul 01 2021Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jun 02 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 12, 2021)