Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Roberto Luis Rene Martinez v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 20-14580 · judgment April 30, 2021
Questions presented
-
When a District Court vacates a sentence pursuant to the United States Supreme Court Decision in RUTLEDGE v. UNITED STATES, 116 S.Ct 1246 , 134 L.ed. 2d 419, 517 U.S. 292 (1996). Is a Correction of the Defendants Judgment and Commitment Order required.
-
Does the District Court1s failure to correct a Defendant's Judgment and Commitment Order represent a deprivation of life and liberty as defined by the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution
-
Does the District Court's refusal to correct the Judgment and Commitment order essentially create a double jeopardy? Multiple teirs of government agencies have used and will use this information to deprive Martinez of his Life and Liberty based on a count that was vacated through due process. !i
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Roberto Luis Rene Martinez
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
- Jul 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jul 01 2021Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jun 02 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 12, 2021)