Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
John Anderson v. The University of Iowa, et al.
IFP petition · Supreme Court of Iowa, No. 20-1342 · judgment December 30, 2020
Questions presented
-
Is a Notice of Appeal, although with the trial courts designation, but filed with the Appellate Court automatic grounds for dismissal?
-
If there are Tolling Statutes regarding a Notice Appeal, and the filer has a disability, does this alleviate the oversight.
-
Is due process/14th Amendment abused by in this incidence an overreliance on procedure vs content?
-
If the case is a First Amendment case relegating it to strict scrutiny, shouldn't this imply at least giving a mentioned of tolling?
-
If COVID is raging at the time that the late-Supreme Court Decision Making by Harold Specht, NOA is due, doesn't external circumstances with a shown desire to follow the letter of the law show an averment?
-
The "late" Notice was filed within the 30 day mark but with the wrong court. Another one was filed with the right court but past the 30 day mark, Isn't horseshoes better than a packing up and taking the game home a little too much emphasis on procedure on the Appellate Courts part? With ail due respect.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John Anderson
For respondent
Samuel Paul Langholz
Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jul 01 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jun 28 2021Waiver of right of respondent Univ. of Iowa, et al. to respond filed.
- Mar 26 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 6, 2021)