Jasma McCullough v. Shaylonda Herron, et al.

Whether a child abuse investigator can give a medical diagnosis/opinion to the court without a Doctors opinion to remove a child.

Whether unauthorized practice of Medicine violates both Procedural and Substantive Due Process

Whether the District and Appellate courts can determine if /when drugs have been used without seeking the opinion of a Medical Review Officer/Expert when removing a child.

Whether simply notifying a parent of a child abuse allegation satisfy the 14th Amendment Procedural Due Process requirements when removing a child.

Whether a child abuse investigator relying on an uncorroborated allegation and testifying that it is “known knowledge of facts” violates the 14th Amendment Substantive Due Process Clause.

Whether a child abuse investigator can give a false testimony in effort to remove a child if probable cause exists for any other reason. 7. Whether a child abuse investigator withholding exculpatory evidence constitute perjury by omission and violate the 14th Amendment Substantive and Procedural Due Process Clause.

Whether a court could accept a disputed affidavit used to remove a child in a prior proceeding as true and correct without requiring evidence.