Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Martin James Kipp v. Ron Broomfield, Acting Warden

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 15-99020 · judgment August 19, 2020


Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021

Question presented

At Martin Kipp’s capital trial, the prosecutor presented evidence that Kipp worshipped Satan and concluded his penalty-phase closing by asserting that Kipp “has murder in his heart, has Satan [in] his soul.” After three days of deliberations, the jurors voted for death only after one of them brought a Bible into the jury room and read several passages from it to the others, including the phrase, “an eye for an eye.” Eight of the jurors self-identified as Christian. The question presented is: Whether clearly established federal law requires that a habeas petitioner’s claim that his constitutional rights were violated because a juror read passages from the Bible to other jurors during capital-sentencing deliberations be analyzed under the presumed prejudice rule of Mattox v. United States, 146 U.S. 140, 150 (1892), and Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227, 229 (1954), because the Bible-reading is an impermissible external influence on the jury’s deliberations and verdict.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Mark R. Drozdowski
Office of the Federal Public Defend

For respondent
Randall D. Einhorn
California Attorney General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Aug 05 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  3. Aug 04 2021
    Reply of petitioner Martin Kipp filed. (Distributed)
  4. Jul 21 2021
    Brief of respondent Ron Broomfield, Acting Warden in opposition filed.
  5. Jun 16 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 21, 2021.
  6. Jun 15 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 21, 2021 to July 21, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. May 18 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2021)