Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Byron Montijo-Maysonet v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, No. 18-1640 · judgment September 1, 2020
Questions presented
-
The enticement of minors over the internet is criminalized under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The First Circuit upheld the § 2422(b) conviction below based on nonsexual messages between petitioner and a minor after they first met in person. The message arranged a second in-person meeting when the two had sex. Is § 2422(b)’s internet-based enticement element satisfied when two people who already know each other have sex after exchanging non-specific, non-sexual text messages to arrange their meeting?
-
Under 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a), if an adult transports a minor for criminal sexual activity, it is not a federal crime in a U.S. state unless a state border is crossed. In contrast, within Puerto Rico and some U.S. territories, the same conduct is criminalized under § 2423(a). While this Court has applied rational basis review to civil laws discriminating against Puerto Rico residents, the standard remains at issue in United States v. Vaello– Madero and has not been extended to criminal laws. Does § 2423(a) violate the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Commerce Clause? -i-
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Kevin Edward Lerman
Federal Public Defender, District of Puerto Rico
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jul 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jul 07 2021Reply of petitioner Byron Montijo-Maysonet filed. (Distributed)
- Jun 21 2021Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
- May 15 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 18, 2021)