Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Rosa Elba Ventura de Paulino v. New York City Department of Education, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 19-1662 · judgment May 18, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Does a school district have an affirmative obligation to provide pendency-related educational and support services to its special education students under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), 20 U.S.C. §1400, et seq.? If a school district has such an obligation, may the parent of a special education student procure the pendency services to which the student is entitled under the IDEA, when the district has failed to procure them?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Rory J. Bellantoni
Brain Injury Rights Group, Ltd.
For respondent
Barbara Dale Underwood
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Mar 08 2021Rehearing DENIED.
- Feb 17 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.
- Feb 05 2021Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Jan 11 2021Petition DENIED.
- Dec 16 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
- Dec 09 2020Waiver of right of respondent New York State Education Department to respond filed.
- Dec 04 2020Waiver of right of respondent New York City Department of Education to respond filed.
- Nov 19 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 28, 2020)