Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Chris Jaye v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2019-1458 · judgment August 6, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Has the US Court of Federal Claims and US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit acting in opposition to controlling law (.Erickson v. Pardus, Johnson v. City of Shelby) by implementing its own pleading standard different from other circuits?
-
Does a federal judge have the right to impose his/her own will and wants into a citizen’s complaint to alter the facts alleged as a basis for dismissal? Can a federal judge impose presumed limits on the jurisdiction of a federal court to deprive a citizen the right to petition her own government (First Amendment.)?
-
What remedies exist in the law when lies are not corrected and not addressed in the record? What remedies exist in the law when a judge (protected by judicial immunity) illegally dismisses a valid case? How does a citizen remedy this wrong and deprivation of a right (First Amendment) caused by the lies of a judge?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Chris Ann Jaye
For respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Proceedings
- Jan 11 2021Petition DENIED.
- Dec 09 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
- Dec 01 2020Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Feb 22 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2020)
- Dec 30 2019Application (19A720) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 23, 2020.
- Dec 17 2019Application (19A720) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 25, 2019 to February 23, 2020, submitted to The Chief Justice.