Amy R. Gurvey v. Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., et al.

(2) 1. Question #1: In this US patent litigation, whether Petitioner, a Pro Se patentee who is sole named inventor of valuable US ticketing method, apparatus and design patents1, is entitled to a Writ of Certiorari under the All Writs Act, 28 USC § 1651(a), against the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or against the US District Court for the SDNY directly to order the SDNY to reinstate and adjudicate Petitioner’s strict liability patent infringement and nonjoinder amended complaint also seeking injunctive relief pursuant to 35 USC §§271, 256, FRCP Rule 15, duly filed, date-stamped and docketed by the SDNY Clerk that was unlawfully deleted ex parte from the district court docket without notice to Plaintiff in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and never thereafter reinstated or adjudicated? Based on Justice William Brennan’s 1988 “pingpong’ decision and order in Christianson 1 Gurvey US Ticketing Patent Nos. 7603321; D647910S issued on October 13, 2009 and November 1, 2011.