Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Kelly Georgene Routten v. John Tyler Routten
Paid petition · Supreme Court of North Carolina, No. 455A18 · judgment June 5, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The Due Process Claus forbids States from removing a minor child from a parent’s custody without a hearing on that parent’s fitness. Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 658 (1972) (“all [] parents are constitutionally entitled to a hearing on their fitness before their children are removed from their custody”). The North Carolina Supreme Court held, in conflict with twenty-eight other state courts of last resort, that no finding of unfitness is required because this “right is irrelevant in a custody proceeding between two natural parents.” Routten v. Routten, 372 N.C. 571, 577, 843 S.E.2d 154, 159 (2020). The question presented is: 1. Does due process require a finding that a parent is unfit before a State denies that parent all visitation with their child?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Robert Daniel Gibson
Stam Law Firm
For respondent
Jill Schnabel Jackson
Jackson Family Law
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Amicus briefs
2 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Feb 22 2021Rehearing DENIED.
- Jan 13 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
- Jan 05 2021Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Dec 14 2020Petition DENIED.
- Dec 07 2020Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Parents, Inc. d/b/a ParentsUSA filed.
- Dec 07 2020Brief amicus curiae of The Justice Foundation filed.
- Nov 24 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
- Nov 04 2020Waiver of right of respondent John Tyler Routten to respond filed.
- Nov 02 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)