Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Hallmark Care Services, Inc., et al. v. Superior Court of Washington, Spokane County, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 19-35553 · judgment June 17, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Spokane County initiated and prosecuted, without counsel, and directly through judicial members of its local superior court 124 joint actions against the Petitioners by mailing unfiled, ex parte letter orders; by entering ex parte orders without notice or hearing; by holding scores of expedited “drumhead” hearings by which the government summarily transferred clients to competing businesses; and, by entering money judgments against the Petitioners and in favor of Spokane County absent any due process, without notice, without hearing, and without any opportunity to defend against the government's actions. The question presented to this Court is whether the doctrine of judicial immunity extends beyond protecting the individual judges, personally, for their actions, to shielding the government, on whose behalf they acted, from a citizen's claims seeking redress for the damages arising from the unconstitutional actions of the court?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John William Pierce
Law Office of John Pierce. P.S.
For respondent
Luke Wesley O'Bannan
Kirkpatrick & Startzel, P.S.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 11 2021Petition DENIED.
- Dec 23 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
- Dec 04 2020Brief of respondent Spokane County, Washington, et al. in opposition filed.
- Oct 29 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 4, 2020)