Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Hallmark Care Services, Inc., et al. v. Superior Court of Washington, Spokane County, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 17-35678, 17-35717 · judgment June 17, 2020


Certiorari denied · January 11, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 3% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

Spokane County initiated and prosecuted, through members of its local superior court and without counsel, 124 actions against the Petitioners by mailing un­filed, ex parte letter orders; by entering ex parte orders without notice or hearing; and, by holding scores of expedited “drumhead” hearings through which the government summarily transferred clients to competing businesses; by entering money judgments against the Petitioners absent any due process. Petitioners promptly appealed, and while the state­court appeal was pending they filed due process claims in the local federal district court which ultimately dismissed the action based on the Rooker­Feldman doctrine and judicial immunity.

  1. Does the Rooker­Feldman doctrine bar federal constitutional claims arising from a government action in the state trial court in before a final ruling in the matter was entered in the state courts?

  2. Does the doctrine of judicial immunity extend beyond personally protecting the individual judges to shielding the government from a citizen's claims seeking redress for the damages arising from the unconstitutional actions of the state court?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
John William Pierce
Law Office of John Pierce. P.S.

For respondent
Patrick W. Harwood
Kirkpatrick & Startzel, P.S.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jan 11 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 23 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
  3. Dec 04 2020
    Brief of respondents Superior Court of Washington for the County of Spokane, et al. in opposition filed.
  4. Oct 29 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 4, 2020)