Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Michigan v. Laricca Seminta Mathews

Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Michigan, No. 339079 · judgment May 22, 2018

Certiorari denied · March 1, 2021

Pre-decision estimate: 3% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Should this Court grant certiorari to resolve the split in the United States Courts of Appeals and the state appellate courts regarding whether Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), is satisfied when a suspect in custody is advised at the beginning of an interrogation that they have the right to an attorney, but is not explicitly advised that they are entitled to the attorney’s presence before and during interrogation?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
—

For respondent
Joseph Alan Lavigne
Law Offices of Joseph A. Lavigne

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

Mar 01 2021
Petition DENIED.
Feb 10 2021
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
Jan 22 2021
Brief of respondent Laricca Seminta Mathews in opposition filed.
Nov 13 2020
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 25, 2021.
Nov 12 2020
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 25, 2020 to January 25, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
Oct 21 2020
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 25, 2020)