James MacDonald v. Louis E. Kempinsky, et al.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUESTION®) PRESENTED l) Once again, the California SLAPP LAW has denied due process, denied equal protection, denied access to the Courts, penalized those petitioning for redress and denied even limit rights of discovery to defend against Defendants’ SLAPP motions. Plaintiff was denied discovery to prove allegations of material false statements in a verified complaint and to prove Defendants’ fraud regarding false statements and other false evidence submitted in the Defendants’ SLAPP motions. The SLAPP law has created unequal access to the Courts by allowing the wellconnected and wealthy to get away with abuses, while burdening those who petition the Courts for redress with hundreds of thousands of dollars in SLAPP attorney fees. This has created a major public policy perception that you cannot seek justice in California and has been the subject of many articles. a. SLAPP law was declared unconstitutional in the States of Washington and Minnesota, as a violation of due process resulting from substantial abuses of the law. This has resulted in unequal protection of due process between the States. The U.S. Supreme Court is asked to intervene and remedy this unequal treatment in California and between the states. b. The California law on its face, denies full discovery completely and only allows limited discover if the Court approves it, which is seldom granted,