Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ho Wong Jeong v. Angel Cabrera, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 19-1882 · judgment March 25, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Did the district court act contrary to this Court’s precedents in Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 521 (1972) and Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) when it denied appellant’s pro se Rule 60(b)(3) motion on the grounds of untimeliness without holding oral argument to inquire into the reasons that appellant waited a bit more than eleven months to file the motion?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Richard Franklin Hawkins III
The Hawkins Law Firm, PC
For respondent
Toby Jay Heytens
Office of the Attorney General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 09 2020Petition DENIED.
- Oct 21 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
- Oct 15 2020Waiver of right of respondent Angel Cabrera, et al. to respond filed.
- Oct 08 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2020)