Gladys Mendoza v. Inspira Health Network, Inc., et al.

Does not the Decision in this case require a reaffirmation and clarification of Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc, 477 U.S. 242, 255 and its progeny where, in considering a motion for summary judgment and depriving plaintiff of her right to trial by jury, that a non-moving party's evidence is to be believed and all justifiable inferences are to be drawn in her favor and the decision of the lower court totally disregarded plaintiff s evidence including the Affidavits of expert witnesses and two expert reports, without explanation as to why it was ignored or found not to be credible and the circuits, in interpreting Anderson have held, with differing standards, such an explanation is required to determine why plaintiff s evidence was not believed and all inferences were not drawn in her favor? Does this not violate the preservation of the right of trial by jury as mandated by the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution and violate this Court s requirements as set forth in Anderson? (Suggested answer in the affirmative)