Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Michael Elder v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 18-3713 · judgment March 9, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether the Second Circuit violated the party presentation principle articulated in United States v. Sineneng-Smith, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (2020) when, in affirming the district court’s decision denying a motion to suppress, it held that the exclusionary rule is inapplicable, even though the government waived the argument and neither party briefed or raised the issue at any stage.
-
Whether this Court’s exclusionary rule jurisprudence requires evidence to be suppressed when it is found during a suspicionless search of a federal supervisee’s home, and the officer conducting the search knew that at least reasonable suspicion was required but deliberately disregarded that requirement and conducted the search anyway.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Dwayne Dason Sam
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
For respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 11 2021Petition DENIED.
- Dec 23 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
- Dec 22 2020Reply of petitioner Michael Elder filed. (Distributed)
- Dec 09 2020Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- Nov 06 2020Motion of United States for an extension of time not accepted for filing. (November 09, 2020)
- Nov 05 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 9, 2020.
- Nov 04 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 9, 2020 to December 9, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
- Oct 05 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 9, 2020)