Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
S. O., et al. v. District of Columbia
Paid petition · District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 17-FS-444 · judgment August 23, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
This Court has held that the state and federal government’s use of fabricated evidence and perjured testimony violates an individual’s Due Process rights so as to render a criminal proceeding fundamentally unfair. While a number; of states, including the District of Columbia, afford substantive and procedural protections to parents and children in civil neglect proceedings similar to those made available to a criminal defendant, the breath of these protections as required by the Constitution, where the government uses fabricated evidence and perjured testimony, is still unknown. The question presented is: Whether the Fifth Amendment prohibits the District of Columbia’s use of fabricated evidence and perjured testimony in a civil child neglect proceeding, and the appropriate remedy thereof. n
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Stephen P. Ollar
For respondent
Stacy Louise Anderson
Office of the Attorney General for D.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Linked docket
20M11
Proceedings
- Nov 23 2020Petition DENIED.
- Nov 04 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.
- Nov 02 2020Waiver of right of respondent District of Columbia to respond filed.
- Oct 05 2020Motion (20M11) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
- Jul 22 2020MOTION (20M11) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
- Jul 08 2020Motion (20M11) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
- Jul 08 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 4, 2020)