Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Mary Strong v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 19-35544 · judgment July 22, 2020


Certiorari denied · December 7, 2020
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

Did the Trial and Appellate Courts Err:

  1. Failing to recognize the unlawful lockouts barring Mary Strong’s access to and use of the subject property at 65510 Old Bend Redmond Highway, Bend, Oregon, without Mary Strong’s knowledge or permission, standing in Mary Strong’s name only, and prior to any foreclosure action or change of documented title. See Mary Strong’s Opening Brief re Wilmington v. Mary Strong filed May 8, 2018 in Case No.Al66290 in the Court of Appeals, and Supplemental Memorandum In Support Of Updated Motion To Compel Production Of Documents , Case. No. 6:i6~cw00233- MC attached here and made a part of this record.

  2. Failure to recognize and rule that it is not lawful for a mortgage “holder” claiming rights to a mortgage loan to make such claim without holding the original Note.

  3. Failure and refusal of the 9^ Circuit Court of Appeals and lower courts involved in this action to accept and admit into evidence the forensic examination and proof that Respondents do not have possession of the original Mortgage Note, with legal (notfraudulent “robo signed”allonges) demonstrating unbroken and legal chain oftitle, and documented evidence of payment by Respondents for the Mortgage Note and Deed of Trust for the property at 65510 Old Bend Redmond Highway, Bend, Oregon as required bylaw.

  4. Failure to rule that it is not lawful for a party claiming to be the mortgage “holder” to foreclose on a mortgage without demonstration clean and clear chain of title and legal standing regarding the mortgage note SeeORS92.465reFraudand deceit, andBrandrunv. Recontrust Company Bac Lp 20062CB.

  5. Failure and refusal to recognize and properly rule that Respondents, their predecessors, “assignors” and related parties are in violation of the Oregon Trust Deed Act which, among other elements, requires demonstration of the possession of the original mortgage note, and demonstration of evidence of payment for that note.

  6. Failure and refusal to acknowledge, accept, permit, record and document testimony and evidence presented by Mary Strong and witnesses for Mary Strong Petition For Writ of Certiorari 2

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Mary Strong

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Dec 07 2020
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Nov 10 2020
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
  3. Sep 04 2020
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 28, 2020)