Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Alex Rahmi v. Pill & Pill, PLLC
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, No. 18-0533 · judgment September 3, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Statement of Appellate Turisdiction I. Appellate Jurisdiction is referred to power of Higher Court to revise lower's court decision, based on discovery and final ruling of the case. United States District Court has Appellate Jurisdiction authority to hear Criminal Bankruptcy Fraud cases under Federal Law. Subsequently, Bankruptcy Court can not overturn and overrule the Order of United States District Court entered in Petitioner's Bankruptcy Case, and the Order of the United States District Court would not be Newly Discovered Evidence. Whistleblower Protection Act II. The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, 5 U.S.C. 2302(b) (8)-(9), Pub.L. 101-12 as amended, is a United States federal law that protects whistleblowers (Petitioner) who provided and reported existance of an activity constituting a violation of law, rules, regulations, mismanagement, gross waste of funds and abuse of authority, pursuant to foreclosure Fraud schemes of Petitioner's A. residence and B. business real estate assets in Charles Town WV under federal rules and program.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Alex Rahmi
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 07 2020Petition DENIED.
- Nov 10 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
- Jun 08 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 26, 2020)