In Re Lorcan Kilroy

a) Whether or not democrat political bias to protect Sen. Kamala Harris from exposure to criminal prosecution existed in USCA9 No. 19- 55357, enough to warrant an order for non-California based federal law enforcement investigation of criminal obstruction ignored by circuit jurists. b) Whether or not democrat political bias to protect Sen. Kamala Harris existed in USCA9 No. 19-55357, enough to warrant an order that the case be reheard in a different circuit. c) Whether, in termination of public employees with property interests, the ninth circuit’s upholding of indefinite deprivation of all pay, well before the date of hearing offered as satisfying Loudermill, meets U.S. standards set by Loudermill. d) Whether or not proof that the ninth circuit upheld summary judgment without reading the ‘Statement of Uncontroverted Material Facts’ and corresponding ‘Objections And Statements Of Dispute’, meets U.S. standards set by the Supreme Court.