Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al. v. Yolany Padilla, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 19-35565 · judgment March 27, 2020
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before and a Ninth Circuit decision below.
Questions presented
-
Whether 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(l)(B)(ii)—which au thorizes the government to detain aliens who are placed in expedited removal proceedings, but who then estab lish a credible fear of persecution based on a protected ground—violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment because it contains no provision authoriz ing bond hearings.
-
Whether 8 U.S.C. 1252(f)(1) prohibits lower courts from granting classwide injunctions against the operation of 8 U.S.C. 1221-1232. (I)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jeffrey B. Wall
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
For respondent
Matthew Hyrum Adams
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 12 2021JUDGMENT ISSUED.
- Jan 11 2021Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, 591 U. S. ___ (2020).
- Dec 23 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
- Dec 09 2020Brief of respondents Yolany Padilla, et al. in opposition filed.
- Nov 06 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; the time is extended to and including December 9, 2020.
- Nov 05 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 23, 2020 to December 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
- Sep 08 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 23, 2020.
- Sep 04 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 28, 2020 to November 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
- Aug 24 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 28, 2020)