Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Richard Bernholz v. Internal Revenue Service
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 19-3379-cv · judgment April 20, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA") permits individuals to bring claims against the United States for negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of government employees that are acting within the scope of their employment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(l). Where the United States is immune from suit, unless otherwise waived, the FTCA included such a broad waiver of immunity. However, there is a list of exceptions to the waiver of immunity, codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2680. Section 2680 (c) reads: "The provisions of this chapter and section 1346(b) of this title shall not apply to ... [a]ny claim arising in respect of the assessment or collection of any tax or customs duty ..." 28 U.S.C. § 2680(c). The question presented is whether any conduct by the Internal Revenue Service which may broadly be construed as a mechanism for the assessment and collection of a tax, including the conduct alleged in Petitioner's underlying suit, falls within 28 U.S.C. 2680(c)'s exception to the waiver of immunity?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael Bradley Clapp
Michael B. Clapp, Esq.
For respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 19 2020Petition DENIED.
- Sep 30 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
- Sep 23 2020Waiver of right of respondent Internal Revenue Service to respond filed.
- Aug 13 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2020)