Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Steven K. Stanley v. Angel Quiros, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction
Paid petition · Appellate Court of Connecticut, No. AC 40557 · judgment November 26, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Does the intentional use of the *67 feature to obfuscate one’s phone number create a justifiable, reasonable, or a legitimate expectation of privacy which mandates suppression under a Fourth Amendment analysis?
-
Is it improper for a prosecutor to knowingly illicit testimony from a witness in a manner to circumvent well established rules of search and seizure?
-
Was there sufficient evidence to convict the petitioner?
-
Did the Connecticut Habeas Court improperly apply the doctrine of res judicata?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joseph Patten Brown
Law Offices of Pat Brown
For respondent
Kathryn W. Bare
Appellate Bureau - Office of the Chief State's Attorney
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jul 07 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jun 30 2021Waiver of right of respondent Commissioner of Correction to respond filed.
- May 21 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 25, 2021)