Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Drew Hirshfeld, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Implicit, LLC, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2020-1173, 2020-1174
Before the decision, about 8.1× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a federal-government petitioner and counsel who has won certiorari before, and down for a business respondent.
Question presented
Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers who must be appointed by the President with the Senate’s advice and consent, or “inferior Officers” whose appointment Congress has permissibly vested in a department head.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
For respondent
Debra J. McComas
Haynes & Boone, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Nov 19 2021JUDGMENT ISSUED.
- Oct 18 2021Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 594 U. S. ___ (2021).
- Sep 29 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
- Sep 10 2021Response from respondents Implicit, LLC, et al. filed.
- Aug 11 2021Response Requested. (Due September 10, 2021)
- Jul 14 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jun 21 2021Brief of respondent Apple Inc. in support filed.
- May 21 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 21, 2021)