Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Kathryn MacEwen Conti v. Arrowood Indemnity Company
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 20-1172 · judgment December 14, 2020
Certiorari denied · June 28, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
May commercial lenders create non-dischargeable debts by placing language in the promissory notes that identifies the loan as a “student loan,” “educational loan” or other such language mirroring this Court’s pronouncement in Hood and Espinosa that all student loans are non-dischargeable?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Guy Thomas Conti
The Law Offices of Guy T. Conti, PLLC
For respondent
Britton C. Lewis
Carruthers & Roth, P.A.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 28 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jun 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
- May 20 2021Waiver of right of respondent Arrowood Indemnity Company to respond filed.
- May 13 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 16, 2021)