Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jeffrey Olson v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Minnesota, No. A20-1048 · judgment December 30, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Under Minnesota tax procedure, the central procedural event is the issuance of a Commissioner’s Order, by which the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue determines and assesses tax. If the taxpayer fails to file a timely appeal in response to the Commissioner’s Order, the tax assessment in most circumstances becomes final. The Commissioner’s Order in this case was sent by ‘ordinary’ non-certified mail to Petitioner Jeffrey Olson. Olson never received it and therefore did not file a timely appeal. Olson is now legally precluded from ever disputing the merits of the tax assessment. The question presented is whether issuance of the Commissioner’s order by ordinary mail meets constitutional requirements of procedural due process.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Eric William Johnson
Johnson Tax Law P.C.
For respondent
John Mitchell O'Mahoney
Minnesota Attorney General's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 21 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jun 01 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
- May 25 2021Waiver of right of respondent Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue to respond filed.
- May 10 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 14, 2021)