Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Barbara Riley

Paid petition

Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. Is it constitutional for multiple units of Local government and State government to enter, sell, buy, and record facially void ex parte default judgments with bills of costs citywide in never-commenced cases?

  2. Is it constitutional for multiple units of Local and State government to execute purchased-void ex parte default judgments at gun point citywide in never-commenced cases?

  3. Is it constitutional for units of Local and State government to tamper with court docket sheets to show commencement of never-commenced cases?

  4. Is it constitutional for units of Local government and State government to file and record facially void ex parte default judgments in official records citywide for nevercommenced cases?

  5. Is it constitutional for units of Local government to create their own counterfeit titles citywide using their purchased void ex parte default judgments sold citywide in nevercommenced cases?

  6. Is it constitutional for units of Local government and State government to hire, train and retain void ex-parte-default-judgments traffickers, property thieves and other racketeer employees citywide?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Barbara Riley

For respondent
—

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 30 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  3. Apr 21 2021
    Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due June 10, 2021)
    PetitionAppendixProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count