Vinay Yadav v. Texas

Texas contravenes the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution on multi-count and contradicts SCOTUS. SCOTUS has yet to answer all States contradicting due process against Fourteenth Amendment whether COA/Texas-courts a. Prohibit all critical defense-witnesses waiting to testify, b. Prohibit recross to impeach the State-Perjurers present-outside subject-to-recall, c. Neglect perplexed Jury's actual law-questions in-deliberations?

Texas prohibits all the Constitutional Rights of innocent citizens, and contradicts SCOTUS & Federal Laws against Sixth and Ninth Amendments, Whether COA/Texas-courts contravene the U.S. Constitution and Federal laws to :- a. Foster malicious-prosecution, but prohibit Right of innocent citizens' own-summation, and unreasonably off the record to deprive them, b. Deny innocent citizen's Right-to-Represent themselves, c. Deny innocent citizens' Right-to-Testify under­ oath, d. Exempt Corrupt-enterprise-Perjurers to abet white-collar-crimes depriving innocent citizens of their civil rights? (....questions continued to next page) rd 11

Texas misinterprets and contravenes the Texas Laws and contradicts SCOTUS & CCA. SCOTUS has yet to answer whether an active-employee can be involuntarily servitude and false-imprisoned at his employment for a fake-trespass without cause or warrant against the Thirteenth Amendment, § l, and whether COA/Texas-courts with scienter :- a. Oppress applicable Texas-laws from Jury despite repeated lucid-objections during charge formulation (What is employees' defense from Trespass-charge at their own work?), b. Breach Texas-laws to unlawfully deny innocent citizen's rightful Directed-Verdict (Does “falling Petitioner's weak body to the ground due to offduty-police's excessive use-of-force-assaultinjuries” call Resisting?), c. Promote malicious fabricated/defectivecomplaints despite innocent Citizen not even committed a civil-offence, d. Unlawfully deny Motion-to-Reopen during guilt-innocence-phase, e. Filibuster hearings on New-Trial Motions?

Texas contravenes the Rules of Evidence against the U.S. & Texas Constitution and contradicts Federal Laws. SCOTUS has yet to answer whether unreasonable search and seizure at employment without any warrant or cause using off-duty State's force against the Fourth Amendment applies to States, and whether COA/Texas-courts:- a. Exclude critical-evidence after properfoundation & explicit-authentications, b. Aid unlawful seizure, admit spoliation legalinsufficient concealed-evidence and prohibit disproof against it, c. Propagandize irrelevant contextless hearsays, d. Neglect Expert's demonstration on unlawful use-of-force violating Texas rules regulations?