Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Adam P. McNiece v. Town of Yankeetown, Florida, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 20-10716 · judgment June 16, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Can a violation of law or code be charged and tried without any statutory reference of code chapter and section indicated?
-
Will a trial be fair without proper notification as a function of due process?
-
Can a citizen sue the federal government under a First Amendment right to petition, for a redress of grievances?
-
Would this Petition for Redress be an expression of free speech, thereby not limited to two pages for self advocates, while unlimited for lawyers, as is the case in the local rules of the Northern District Court of Florida, in the interest of impartiality?
-
Would due process include appeals up to and including the Supreme Court of these United States?
-
Does the Federal District local rule abridge my right to petition?
-
Can a Judge rule sua sponte in error, while striking from the record the preponderance of evidence to affect the appeal record?
-
Can the Florida Appeals Court decide it’s own appeal simply by not writing an opinion?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Adam P. McNiece
For respondent
Jay Daigneault
Trask Daigneault, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 28 2021Petition DENIED.
- Jun 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
- May 19 2021Waiver of right of respondent Levy County, Florida to respond filed.
- May 19 2021Waiver of right of respondent Town of Yankeetown, Florida to respond filed.
- May 03 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 4, 2021)