Robert C. Laity v. Kamala D. Harris

The U.S. Constitution requires that a President and Vice-President of the United States be a “Natural Born Citizen” of the United States pursuant to Article II, Sec.l, Clause 5 and the 12th Amendment. It is the right of the Sovereign to demand of any public official, whose bona-fides is in question, to prove that he or she is entitled by law to occupy the particular public office he or she now occupies. In the U.S. it is “We the People” who are sovereign. The Petitioner properly filed an “In­ formation in the form of Quo Warranto at Common Law” in the proper venue for such actions, the U.S. Dis­ trict Court for D.C., after then Attorney General of the United States William Barr declined to pursue the is­ sue. Subsequent permission was sought from Acting U.S. Attorney General Rosen after Barr resigned from office. The courts below have denied standing to the Pe­ titioner. The Petitioner filed legal briefs in which he provided sufficient grounds in order to establish stand­ ing to pursue this matter in the name of the United States. Petitioner asserts that Kamala Devi Harris is in office unconstitutionally by virtue of not being a “Natural Born Citizen” of the United States.

1. Can a Constitutionally barred individual remain in office if he/she does not meet a constitutionally mandated criteria for be­ ing in said office?

2. Does the fact that the U.S. Attorney Gen­ eral declined to pursue this matter in the name of the United States incontrovertibly preclude an interested third party