Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Dorothy Neske, et vir, Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of A. N. v. New York City Department of Education
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 19-4068 · judgment October 2, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Does a parent of a special education student forfeit her right to Pendency under §1415(j) of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (“I.D.E.A.”) where the parent unilaterally moves the student from an appropriate private school Pendency placement to a substantially similar private school placement? Does a district court have the authority under the I.D.E.A. to order a school district to reimburse the parent of a special education student for Pendency services up to the amount that it would have cost the school district itself to provide the required Pendency services, or up to the amount that the school district would have paid an appropriate private school placement that was the child’s Pendency placement by operation of law, where the parent unilaterally transfers the student from her Pendency placement to a substantially similar private school placement?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Rory J. Bellantoni
Brain Injury Rights Group, Ltd.
For respondent
Eric Lee
New York City Law Department
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- May 17 2021Petition DENIED.
- Apr 27 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
- Apr 13 2021Waiver of right of respondent New York City Department of Education to respond filed.
- Apr 05 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 10, 2021)