Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Dimitri Shivkov, et al. v. Artex Risk Solutions, Inc., et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 19-16746 · judgment September 9, 2020


Certiorari denied · June 28, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. The parties’ arbitration clause expressly designates the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) as their default dispute-resolution method. The clause did not also specifically mention the AAA Rules themselves, which, according to the AAA, apply whenever parties select a AAA arbitration. Must an agreement that specifies arbitration before the AAA as the default dispute-resolution method also specifically mention the AAA Rules to avoid being considered ambiguous about whether the parties intended to apply the AAA Rules?

  2. Under the plain text of the Federal Arbitration Act, courts—not arbitrators—decide gateway issues, such as whether there is an agreement to arbitrate and what controversies does it cover. Procedural questions, however, are reserved for arbitrators. Is the availability of class arbitration a matter for an arbitrator to decide, or for a court to decide?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
David R. Deary
Loewinsohn Flegle Deary Simon, LLP

For respondent
Linda T. Coberly
Winston & Strawn, LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jun 28 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 08 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
  3. Jun 07 2021
    Reply of petitioners Dimitri Shivkov, Individually and as a Trustee of the Phoenix 2010 Revocable Trust, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  4. May 21 2021
    Brief of respondents Artex Risk Solutions, Inc.,, et al. in opposition filed.
  5. Apr 01 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 21, 2021, for all respondents.
  6. Mar 31 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 21, 2021 to May 21, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Mar 17 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 21, 2021)