Eric S. Clark v. City of Williamsburg, Kansas

QUESTION 1: Should the court adopt the original meaning of the Fourth Amendment by holding that a search of a home(castle) is unreasonable when (i.e., in those in­ stances for which) the implied license operates as the functional equivalent of a general warrant (i.e., acts similar to a writ of assistance)! QUESTION 2: Regardless of whether it would be a reasonable or an unreasonable search of a home, plainly, is it a “search” for Fourth Amendment analysis purposes when the government initiates a physical intrusion into the cur­ tilage of a home with a purpose of seeking information? QUESTION 3: With the lone historical exception of performing “ser­ vice” of a warrant or civil process and apart from a search being unreasonable based on expectation of pri­ vacy and apart from whether or not the government’s action exceeds what the implied license permits . . . Is it an “unreasonable” search when the government initiates a “physical intrusion of the curtilage of home” without a permissible warrant (i.e., a warrant that con­ tains a particularized description) and the objectively determinable purpose is to seek information about a violation of law!