Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Barbara Riley

Paid petition


Certiorari denied · May 17, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

• Is it constitutional for officers of the courts to be creating, selling and buying facially null and void judge's personal orders entered/issued without jurisdiction daily nationwide for 231 years last and ongoing? U.S. District Court Clerk's Administrative Order 440 Summons issued in a civil action. Is it constitutional for officers of the court to play their own revised legal games in courts and out of courts with their own newly created judge's personal rules/rulings daily nationwide for 231 years last and ongoing? U.S. v. Throckmorton; Norton v. Shelby County. Is it constitutional for officers of the courts and armed-law enforcement officers to put badges and incidents of slavery back on black people and their children and families daily without jurisdiction nationwide for over nine generations and ongoing? U.S. Constitution 13th Amendment. Is it constitutional for officers of the courts and armed-law enforcement officers to overturn or to quash dearly established equal rights of black people and their children and families in courts and out of courts without jurisdiction daily nationwide for over nine generations and ongoing? Miranda v. Arizona

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Barbara Riley

For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. May 17 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 21 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
  3. Apr 19 2021
    Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
  4. Mar 09 2021
    Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due April 19, 2021)