Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
WPEM, LLC v. SOTI Inc.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2020-1483 · judgment December 9, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Does a patent’s presumption of validity afforded by 35 U.S.C. §282 limit a district court’s discretion to find a case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. §285 when it is only later discovered the accused technology is prior art?
-
Given the clear and convincing evidence standard to invalidate a patent, does a district court have the discretion to find a case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. §285 based upon asserted but unproven grounds of invalidity and unenforceability?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
William Peterson Ramey III
Ramey LLP
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- May 17 2021Petition DENIED.
- Apr 27 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
- Mar 16 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 16, 2021)