Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Johlen Johnson, et ux. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, No. 1 CA-CV 19-0369 · judgment April 23, 2020


Certiorari denied · April 26, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Currently Arizona uses a scheme of statutes to effectuate forced conveyances of residential single­ family property via a non-judicial foreclosure. It is known as the Deed of Trust Scheme. Generally, the property is taken from its owner, as here, by way of using the county recorder's office where the property is located. The process includes a total of three documents typically all recorded by the lenders substituted trustee in a 90-day period after which time the trustee sells the property at a trustee sale granting the property to the highest bidder at that sale. One particular concern here is that same trustee later initiated the forcible detainer action against the homeowners. Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 12- 1177 (A) states a trustee’s, deed is presumed to comply with Arizona law and under A.R.S. 83-ll(c) the homeowner •* waives all defenses to that sale once it has occurred. Consequently, any subsequent homeowner claims are mute. See A.R.S. § 12-1177(A) and A.R.S. § 33-811 (C') where borrower "waives all |- Q3¥BD3!1 1I * m b-m

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Johlen Johnson

For respondent
Matthew Hoxsie
Greenberg Trauring, LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Apr 26 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 07 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
  3. Mar 31 2021
    Waiver of right of respondent JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
  4. Feb 22 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 14, 2021)