Eric E. Taylor v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.

QUESTIONS

1. Whether or not it being due-process of law and equity for this appeal to issue forth in this court pursuant rule 11 of this court pursuant the due-process of both the 5th and 14th amendments, on grounds of the jural interest that being 5 U S.C. section 3331 being a law that abridging my entitlement of double-jeopardy-clause-protection, while U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G Sullivan's judgement of civil-action # 20-MC-00001 enforcing the jural interest that being 5 U.C.S. section 3331 at congruencey of Article 1- section 8-clause 9's applicability?

2. Whether or not the lack of the issuance of due-process-clause-entitlements at regards of the United States guaranteeing protection against the deprivation of doublejeopardy-clause-entitlement in the U.S. District Court without having to appeal such civilaction to the Supreme Court of the U.S. pursuant rule 11 of this court, being grounds for the awarding of compensatory damages as relief against the mental anguish sustained against my good-faith of civil-action's application in the U.S. District Court?Court? (see 5 U.S.C. section 3331 's stating)

3. Whether or not the applicabilty of the assertion of 28 U.S.C. section 1343a3 and 1343a4 being the subject-matter jurisdiction of the jurisdictional-statement of 28 U.S.C. section 1331 's application, allow I who being Eric Taylor (s.s.n.#xxx-xx-4342) to practice under the authority of the law office of United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Judge Emmet G Sullivan in the United-States-District-Court-For-The-DistrictOf-Columbia's practicability of the issuance of remedy against the tort of personal injury of mental anguish caused by the negligence of the United-States-Congress's constituting tribunal contrary the allegiance of the authenticity of rule 45 of the rules of the Supreme Court of the United States, if I accomplish receiving a diploma of Legal Office Assistant? (see Article ll-section 2-clause 2's and Article ll-section 3's and 3 U.S.C. section 302's stating)

4. Whether or not the authority of the law office of United States District Court For The District Of Columbia Judge Emmet G Sullivan deprived I who being Eric Taylor (s.s.n.# xxx-xx-4342) of double-jeopardy-clause-elntitlements, thereby such judge's judgement to dismiss with prejudice as accordance of the jural interest of 5 U.S.C. section 3331's employability of preventing any claim for relief I asserted by civil-action 20-MC-00001 against such deprivation; if i can prove that the trial of Virginian Indictment# CR05-2591 being the evidence of Federal Judge Emmet G Sullivan's depriving I who being Eric Taylor (s.s.n.# xxx-xx-4342) of double-jeopardy-clause-elntitlements?Court? (see 5 U.S.C. section 3331's stating)