Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Carline Maria Curry v. Douglas Mackenzie
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Ohio, No. 2020-0727 · judgment December 2, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
THIS IS A QUESTION OF CONSTITUTION CHALLENGE FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT The Ohio Supreme Court declined to accept Jurisdiction of the Appeal & a motion for a new Reconsideration or trial was denied the tenth District Court dismissed my case because they said the brief was not submitted on time; the brief was submitted on time; and I resubmitted it once the clerk told me it wasn’t submitted. The court awarded me partial Liability of 11,671 when I actually spent 14,679.04 (the judge misunderstood what I told her the final balance was for the company to revive the patent.) The judgement entry was not according to law. Mr. Mackenzie failed to plead and I should have been awarded the amount prayed for in the initial complaint which was 100,000,000 million dollars under Rule 4 B Process of Summons and Ohio Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 54 C. The question of constitution challenge is should plaintiff Curry had been awarded the amount prayed For in the initial complaint according to law under Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 4 Process of Summons, and Rule 54 ( C ) Demand.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Carline M. Curry
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Oct 12 2021Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner DENIED.
- Sep 22 2021Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
- Aug 09 2021Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
- May 17 2021Petition DENIED.
- Apr 21 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
- Jan 04 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2021)