Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Kyle Stephen Thompson v. Maryland
Paid petition · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, No. 0198, September Term, 2019 · judgment April 7, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Under Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), if a defendant makes a substantial preliminary showing that (1) the affiant for a search warrant intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause, the Fourth Amendment requires the court to request. Id. at 155-56, 171. Courts reviewing a Franks hearing frequently address the materiality prong first by excising the challenged statements from the affidavit to determine if the remainder of the affidavit contains probable cause. In this context, the following question is presented for review: When a court considers a request for a Franks hearing by excising the challenged statements in the warrant application, does the court review the remaining statements for probable cause under a de novo standard of review?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Stephen Bennett Mercer
RaquinMercer LLC
For respondent
Carrie J. Williams
Goodell DeVries Leech & Dann
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 29 2021Petition DENIED.
- Mar 10 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
- Mar 01 2021Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
- Feb 22 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 29, 2021)