Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
George C. Chatman v. Arrowhead Credit Union
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-55135 · judgment October 29, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
1 Whether we abide by the laws and the constitution of the United States in protecting our secured property Social security? 2 Whether the requirement of due process of law before conversion of secured property ( social security) applicable to this case? 3 Whether the ninth circuit Opinion as insubstaxitial applicable with regards to federal law 42 USC 407(a) that the right of the Petitioner under that subchapter are not subject to execution, levy, attachment, or garnishment,or other legal process? 4 Whether a judgment of the State Court and the jury violated the rule of law? 5 Whether the judgment is considered Oppression under article 1 section 9 U.S. Constitution Knowingly disregarded the right of the Petitioner secured by our laws? 6 Whether the Respondent acting under color of regulation violated federal law 42 USC section 1983 to the deprivation of the Petitioner’s property?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
George C. Chatman
For respondent
Colleen A. Deziel
Anderson, McPharlin & Conners
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 29 2021Petition DENIED.
- Mar 10 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
- Feb 26 2021Waiver of right of respondent Arrowhead Credit Union to respond filed.
- Jan 06 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 15, 2021)